How and why did various land-based empires develop and expand from 1450 to 1750?
How and why did various land-based empires develop and expand from 1450 to 1750?
Asian land-based Empires during 1450-1750 had public displays to legitimize their power. Many of the expanding empires were looking for strategies of centralization to unify them. The empires expanded and conquered more people and land through many military methods, such as the use of gun-powder.
What were the causes for the land-based empires decline?
Why did older, land-based empires decline and/or collapse? -combination of internal and external factors (Ottoman, Russian or the Qing empires) -economic hardship, political and social discontent, technological stagnation, military defeat What new movements challenged the status quo during the age of imperial rule? – …
How did transoceanic interconnections change the world from 1450-1750?
○ The interconnection of the Eastern and Western Hemispheres, made possible by transoceanic voyaging, transformed trade and had a significant social impact on the world. Traditional peasant agriculture increased and changed in nature, plantations expanded, and the Atlantic slave trade developed and intensified.
What technologies did England utilize or develop to establish and maintain their sea based empire?
Technological Innovations What technologies did this empire utilize or develop to establish and maintain their sea- based empire? They depended extensively on gunpowder to support the troops with firearms and cannons and utilized swords and lances as well.
How did labor systems change from 1450 and 1750?
How did labor systems develop between 1450-1750? Traditional peasant agriculture increased and changed, plantations expanded, and demand for labor increased. These changes both fed and responded to growing global demand for raw materials and finished products.
Which societies benefited the most from the emergence of European trading networks and in what ways did they benefit which regions suffered the most and in what ways?
Which regions suffered the most, and in what ways? In terms of who benefited the most, Western Europe and Russia benefited from the trade networks because of the profits they derived from the trade and the increased flow of resources and goods into those regions.
What is a land based empire?
A major difference between these two types of empires is that the empires on the left were predominantly land based, meaning most of their power and wealth came from the land, rich agriculture, and profitable trade routes.
What are the 5 maritime empires?
Terms in this set (8)
- Spanish empire. purpose- exploit gold and provide population outlet; conquistadors established this empire; predominantly located in the americas (exception is the phillipenes)
- Portuguese empire. Bustling trade empire built throughout the Indian Ocean.
- England.
- Dutch.
- Ottoman Empire.
- Mughal.
- Russia.
- Quing.
What are the major characteristics of maritime empires?
Maritime Empires
- Control of trade via limited ports.
- Production & shipment of commodities.
- Colonization of limited territory.
- Limited military confrontations & investments.
- Exploitation of improved maritime technology.
- Expanded exploration & control of distance areas.
- Dependence on native collaborators.
What is the meaning of Maritime?
1 : of, relating to, or bordering on the sea a maritime province. 2 : of or relating to navigation or commerce on the sea.
What is a maritime empire?
What is a Maritime Empire? An empire with smaller pieces of land which are separated by large bodies of water. Settled in areas that would provide profit to the empire. Divided power between their lands.
How were the Ottoman Safavid and Mughal empires similar?
1 Safavid, Mughal, and Ottoman Empires. The three Islamic empires of the early modern period – the Mughal, the Safavid, and the Ottoman – shared a common Turko-Mongolian heritage. In all three the ruling dynasty was Islamic, the economic system was agrarian, and the military forces were paid in grants of land revenue.
Why did the Ottomans and Safavids fight?
The protracted conflict between the Ottomans and the Safavids was based on territorial and religious differences. As Sunni Muslims, the Ottoman Empire also disagreed with the Shi’i Safavids over basic religious tenets and practices, similar to the disputes between various Catholic and Protestant powers in Europe.
What were two main causes of the bitter rivalry between the Ottoman and Safavid empires?
Terms in this set (5) What were two main causes of the bitter rivalry between the Ottoman and Safavid Empires? because each empire wanted to expand into the other territory and because other empires were Sunni (Ottoman Empire) and the other was Shi’ite (Safavid Empire). The arts flourished in the Mughal Empire.
What was a major source of cultural religious tension between the Safavid and Ottoman Empire?
No money for military expansion. What was the source of conflict between the Ottomans and the Safavids? The Ottomans were Sunni Muslims and the Safavids were Shia Muslims. Both the Ottoman sultan and the Savavid shah claimed to be the spiritual leader of all Islam.